AttorneyKenneth Clayton Garner
KG

Kenneth Clayton Garner

N/a

Dallas, TX · Dallas County · 30 years licensed

Cases
130
Licensed
30 yrs

Kenneth Clayton Garner has been licensed in Texas since Nov 1995 — 30 years — and has filed under this bar number in 130 cases since 1982, four in five of them in Harris County courts. The docket is divorce: 51 of 130 filings, with criminal and civil (other) behind it. No board certifications, no disciplinary history, and no client reviews yet.

Cases filed by year1982 – 2016
815’82’98’00’02’04’06’08’10’12’14’16

We hold filings under this bar number from 1982 to present in the county court records Referlex has imported.

Case type by yearCourt-record case types
DivorceDivorceClass B misdemeanorClass B misdemeanorDivorce with ChildrenDivorce with ChildrenFOCAS - Divorce w/ ChildrenFOCAS - Divorce w/ ChildrenState jail felonyState jail felonyClass A misdemeanorClass A misdemeanorContractContractOther CivilOther CivilAll Other Family Law MattersAll Other Family Law MattersClass C misdemeanorClass C misdemeanor34 other types34 other types’82’98’00’02’04’06’08’10’12’14’16
Criminal charge outcomes31 charge records · county criminal records

Of 31 criminal charge records associated with this bar number across 31 cases, 30 (97%) have a recorded disposition. Percentages below use all 31 records.

Dismissed or acquitted45%14
Dismissed 14
Deferral recorded23%7
Deferred adjudication 7
Convicted29%9
Convicted on a guilty or nolo plea 9
Other recorded status0%0
No disposition recorded3%1
By charge27 charges · 1–10 of 27
ChargeCasesConv.Outcome mix
Charges 1–10 of 27

These are record associations, not win rates: representation at disposition is not established, and several attorneys can appear on one charge. Outcomes are the latest recorded disposition of each charge; a missing disposition does not establish whether a charge is pending or how it ended. Percentages are rounded. No defendant details are shown.

Courts appeared in most130 cases · 50 courts

Cases are grouped by the court a filing names; appellate courts group together, not under the county a case came from.

Client reviewsNone yet

No reviews yet.

Last refreshed Sep 2026